Resistance is futile!: K. Brad Wray: Resisting scientific realism, Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224 pp, $105 HB [Book Review]

Metascience 29 (1):5-10 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11016-020-00486-3

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Resisting scientific anti-realism: K. Brad Wray. Resisting scientific realism. Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224 pp, $105 HB. [REVIEW]Stathis Psillos - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):17-24.
Resisting scientific anti-realism: K. Brad Wray: Resisting scientific realism. Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224pp, $105 HB. [REVIEW]Peter Vickers - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):11-16.
Resisting Scientific Realism with or Without van Fraassen’s Darwinian Explanation: K. Brad Wray: Resisting Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224pp, $105 HB. [REVIEW]P. Kyle Stanford - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):25-31.
Resisting Scientific Realism, by K. Brad Wray: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2018, Pp. xii + 224. [REVIEW]Elay Shech - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (2):861-866.
K. Brad Wray: Resisting Scientific Realism, Book Review. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2018. [REVIEW]Ragnar van der Merwe - 2020 - Journal for the General Philosophy of Science 51 (4):637-641.
Kuhn’s normal scholarship: K. Brad Wray (Ed.): Interpreting Kuhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 263 pp, £75.00 HB. [REVIEW]Vincenzo Politi - 2022 - Metascience 31 (2):231-234.
Kuhn’s philosophical conception of science as evolutionary, social, and epistemological: K. Brad Wray: Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, xiii+229pp, £58 HB.Thomas Nickles - 2013 - Metascience 23 (1):37-42.
K. Brad Wray, "Resisting Scientific Realism." Reviewed by.Robert Hudson - 2019 - Philosophy in Review 39 (4):224-226.
Resisting Scientific Realism. By K. Brad Wray.Glenn Statile - 2019 - International Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2):237-239.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-13

Downloads
29 (#774,799)

6 months
5 (#1,039,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven French
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

Darwinian-Selectionist Explanation, Radical Theory Change, and the Observable-Unobservable Dichotomy.Elay Shech - 2021 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):221-241.
Induction, Rationality, and the Realism/Anti-realism Debate: A Reply to Shech.K. Brad Wray - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):243-247.
Does Explaining Past Success Require (Enough) Retention? The Case of Ptolemaic Astronomy.José Díez, Gonzalo Recio & Christian Carman - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (4):323-344.

Add more citations

References found in this work

To what physics corresponds.Simon Saunders - 1993 - In S. French & H. Kamminga (eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: Essays in Honour of Heinz Post. Dordrecht: Reidel. pp. 295--325.
Disarming the Ultimate Historical Challenge to Scientific Realism.Peter Vickers - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (3):987-1012.

View all 6 references / Add more references