Resisting scientific anti-realism: K. Brad Wray. Resisting scientific realism. Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224 pp, $105 HB [Book Review]

Metascience 29 (1):17-24 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11016-020-00488-1

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Resisting scientific anti-realism: K. Brad Wray: Resisting scientific realism. Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224pp, $105 HB. [REVIEW]Peter Vickers - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):11-16.
Resistance is futile!: K. Brad Wray: Resisting scientific realism, Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224 pp, $105 HB. [REVIEW]Steven French - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):5-10.
Resisting Scientific Realism with or Without van Fraassen’s Darwinian Explanation: K. Brad Wray: Resisting Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224pp, $105 HB. [REVIEW]P. Kyle Stanford - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):25-31.
K. Brad Wray: Resisting Scientific Realism, Book Review. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2018. [REVIEW]Ragnar van der Merwe - 2020 - Journal for the General Philosophy of Science 51 (4):637-641.
Resisting Scientific Realism, by K. Brad Wray: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2018, Pp. xii + 224. [REVIEW]Elay Shech - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (2):861-866.
K. Brad Wray, "Resisting Scientific Realism." Reviewed by.Robert Hudson - 2019 - Philosophy in Review 39 (4):224-226.
Kuhn’s normal scholarship: K. Brad Wray (Ed.): Interpreting Kuhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 263 pp, £75.00 HB. [REVIEW]Vincenzo Politi - 2022 - Metascience 31 (2):231-234.
Still resisting: replies to my critics.K. Brad Wray - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):33-40.
Resisting Scientific Realism by K. Brad Wray. [REVIEW]Samuel Ruhmkorff - 2019 - British Journal for Philosophy of Science Review of Books 1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-17

Downloads
44 (#505,587)

6 months
7 (#706,906)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stathis Psillos
University of Athens

Citations of this work

On the very idea of pursuitworthiness.Jamie Shaw - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):103-112.
Darwinian-Selectionist Explanation, Radical Theory Change, and the Observable-Unobservable Dichotomy.Elay Shech - 2021 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):221-241.
Induction, Rationality, and the Realism/Anti-realism Debate: A Reply to Shech.K. Brad Wray - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):243-247.
Running Mice and Successful Theories: The Limitations of a Classical Analogy.Matthias Egg & August Hämmerli - 2024 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 55 (3):309-326.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.

Add more references