Wittgenstein et le logicisme de Russell : Remarques critiques sur « A Mathematical Proof Must be Surveyable » de F. Mühlhölzer

Philosophiques 39 (1):163-187 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ce texte discute certaines conclusions d’un article récent de F. Mülhölzer et vise à montrer que le logicisme russellien a les moyens de résister à la critique que Wittgenstein lui adresse dans la partie III des Remarques sur les fondements desmathématiques.This paper discusses some conclusions of a recent article from F.Mülhölzer. It aims at showing that Russell’s logicism has the means to overcome the criticisms Wittgenstein expounded in Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, part III

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
61 (#350,882)

6 months
9 (#497,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Russell's hidden substitutional theory.Gregory Landini - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophische Bemerkungen.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1971 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:253-254.
Philosophische Grammatik.Erik Stenius, Ludwig Wittgenstein & Rush Rhees - 1971 - Philosophical Quarterly 21 (85):376.
Philosophische Bemerkungen.Erik Stenius, Ludwig Wittgenstein & Rush Rhees - 1966 - Philosophical Quarterly 16 (65):371.

View all 11 references / Add more references