Who, What and Where (WWW) Problems in Scientific Communities

Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):327-330 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The results of the National Higher Education Entrance Examination have a life-long effect on most Chinese by labeling them clever or not. Some of the following rules of the Gaokao enhance the damage, for example, the rule of Who, What and Where. In general, Who you are and What you have done are of secondary importance, but Where you graduated from, especially the college of first-record is the most important, but discriminatory criterion in the recruitment courses of most of scientific communities and social organizations in China.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Michael Tooley - 5 Questions.Michael Tooley - 2014 - In Gregg D. Caruso (ed.), Science and Religion: 5 Questions. Automatic Press/VIP. pp. 223–33.
The Rule of Justice: The Compassionate Application of Law to Life.Rosalie Silberman Abella - 2023 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 36 (2):305-315.
Now you know who Hong oak yun is.David Braun - 2006 - Philosophical Issues 16 (1):24-42.
Disciplinary Actions and Pain Relief: Analysis of the Pain Relief Act.Sandra H. Johnson - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):319-327.
Disciplinary Actions and Pain Relief: Analysis of the Pain Relief Act.Sandra H. Johnson - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):319-327.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-06

Downloads
29 (#772,073)

6 months
9 (#477,108)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references