Outcomes Research and Practice Guidelines: Upstream Issues for Downstream Users

Hastings Center Report 26 (2):38-44 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With both the cost and quality of health care under scrutiny, many in the health care industry have turned to outcomes research and practice guidelines for answers. But many physicians have resisted, claiming their clinical judgment is a better guide. Both camps may be right.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The role of research in setting priorities for health care.Kathleen N. Lohr - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (1):79-82.
The Physician as a Health Care Proxy.Arti Rai, Mark Siegler & John Lantos - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (5):14-19.
The role of health economics in clinical evaluation.Mkhael Drummond - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (1):71-75.
Guidelines for clinical Practice: What They Are and why They count.Kathleen N. Lohr - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (1):49-56.
Guidelines for clinical Practice: What They Are and why They count.Kathleen N. Lohr - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (1):49-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
27 (#834,437)

6 months
7 (#740,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fred Gifford
Michigan State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references