Fathers and Sons, Sacrifice and Substitution: Mimetic Theory and Islam in Genesis 22 and Sura 37

In Michael Kirwan & Ahmad Achtar (eds.), Mimetic Theory and Islam: "The Wound Where Light Enters". Springer Verlag. pp. 65-85 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author’s comparative study of Genesis 22 and Sura 37 is intended to shed light on key questions arising from Girard’s own ambivalent comments on Islam and its alleged return to “archaic” religion. Goodhart’s contribution to the major task of interpreting our contemporary situation is a close comparative reading of the named texts. They share, he claims, a common trajectory of anti-idolatry and the “war against child sacrifice.” They urge us toward a new dramatic view of the akeidah, one in which “we must learn to hear commandments in quotation marks, i.e. prophetically.” The core tradition of anti-idolatry is more implicit in the biblical tradition and its commentaries but is explicitly expressed in the Qur’an. In each case, the call to “read prophetically”—“with the eyes of the prophet”—is identical.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Prison Violence in France and Mimetic Theory.Yaniss Warrach - 2019 - In Michael Kirwan & Ahmad Achtar (eds.), Mimetic Theory and Islam: "The Wound Where Light Enters". Springer Verlag. pp. 141-148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
4 (#1,807,862)

6 months
2 (#1,694,052)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references