B is innocent

Analysis 61 (3):225-229 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper replies to an earlier paper by Yannis Stephanou, who presented an argument purportedly showing the falsity of certain instances of the characteristic axiom of the modal logic B. The paper argues that the B axiom was not to blame for the unsoundness of Stephanou's argument.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Modal Logic vs. Ontological Argument.Andrezej Biłat - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):179--185.
On Axiomatization of Łukasiewicz's Four-Valued Modal Logic.Marcin Tkaczyk - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (3):215-232.
The Possibility of Unicorns and Modal Logic.Lee Walters - 2014 - Analytic Philosophy 55 (2):295-305.
Joyce’s Argument for Probabilism.Patrick Maher - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (1):73-81.
The RM paraconsistent refutation system.Tomasz Skura - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (1):65-70.
Negation introduced with the unary connective.Gemma Robles - 2009 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 19 (3):371-388.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
332 (#84,507)

6 months
75 (#81,479)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dominic Gregory
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

From Dispositions to Possible Worlds.Daniel Kodaj - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-20.
Existence Requirement, World-Indexed Properties, and Contingent Apriori.Oleh Bondar - 2022 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 63 (152):297-316.
Naturalización de la Metafísica Modal.Carlos Romero - 2021 - Dissertation, National Autonomous University of Mexico

Add more citations

References found in this work

Necessary beings.Yannis Stephanou - 2000 - Analysis 60 (2):188-193.

Add more references