Consenting for Current Genetic Research: Views of Canadian Institutional Review Board Members

&
Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 6 (4) (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.4172/2155-9627.1000231

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Broad Data Sharing in Genetic Research: Views of Institutional Review Board Professionals.Grrip Consortium Amy A. Lemke, Maureen E. Smith, Wendy A. Wolf, Susan Brown Trinidad - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (3):1.
Balanced Ethics Review: A Guide for Institutional Review Board Members.Ames Dhai - 2016 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 9 (2):93-93.
Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?Iris Jaitovich Groisman, Nathalie Egalite & Beatrice Godard - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):80.
Institutional Review Board (IRB): its role and responsibility in making research ethical.Abu Sadat Mohammad Nurunnabi - 2014 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):5-10.
Management of Incidental Findings from Genetic Tests: Perspectives of Ethics Committee Members.Leigh Jackson Lesley Goldsmith - 2015 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 6 (3).
Roles and Experiences of Non-scientist Institutional Review Board Members at the National Institutes of Health.Robert D. Allison, Lura J. Abbott & Alison Wichman - 2008 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30 (5):8.
Launching the Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Authority Act and Reflections on its Current Status.Penny Moody-Corbett & Sharon Buehler - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 5 (1):16-32.
The Nuts and Bolts of IRBs.Don Workman - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (2).
Towards a balanced approach to identifying conflicts of interest faced by institutional review boards.Sharon Kaur & Sujata Balan - 2015 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (5):341-361.
The assessment of the risk - benefit ratio of phase II cancer clinical trials by Institutional Review Board members.A. W. Musschenga - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-18

Downloads
24 (#905,788)

6 months
5 (#1,035,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Beatrice Godard
Université de Montréal

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Institutional Review Board Approaches to the Incidental Findings Problem.Moira A. Keane - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):352-355.

Add more references