Human Dignity of “Offenders”: A Limitation on Substantive Criminal Law [Book Review]

Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):187-205 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper argues for attaching a significant role to the dignity of offenders as a limitation on the scope of substantive criminal law. Three different aspects of human dignity are discussed. Human dignity is closely connected with the principle of culpability. Respecting the dignity of offenders requires that we assign criminal liability according to the actual attitudes of the offenders towards the interests protected by the offence. The doctrine of natural and probable consequence of complicity, which allows us to assign liability for mens rea offenses to a negligent offender, violates the dignity of the offender; it treats the incautious offender as if she had willfully expressed disrespect towards the protected interest. The human dignity core of privacy is invaded by criminalizing the private possession of child pornography. By extending the prohibition of the creation, sale and distribution of child pornography to the private possession of pornography, the State attempts to control the way the individual expresses an essential part of the self—his sexual fantasies—within himself. Dignity demands that our actions convey an attitude of respect towards human beings. The expressive meaning of disrespect is culture-dependent. The historical association with totalitarian regimes explains our reluctance to impose a legal duty to report past crime: the individual who is legally required to turn a suspect into the police is viewed as an “informant.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Criminalizing Behaviour to Protect Human Dignity.Tatjana Hörnle - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):307-325.
Human Dignity and the Innocent Agent.Shachar Eldar - 2024 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 18 (2):617-636.
Paternalism and Human Dignity.John Kleinig - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):19-36.
Human Dignity in Croatia.Biljana Kostadinov - 2019 - In Paolo Becchi & Klaus Mathis, Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe. Springer Verlag. pp. 151-171.
Human Dignity in Slovakia.Tomáš Ľalík - 2019 - In Paolo Becchi & Klaus Mathis, Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe. Springer Verlag. pp. 799-815.
Human Dignity in Albania.Arta Vorpsi - 2019 - In Paolo Becchi & Klaus Mathis, Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe. Springer Verlag. pp. 37-61.
Human Dignity in Montenegro.Duška Franeta - 2019 - In Paolo Becchi & Klaus Mathis, Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe. Springer Verlag. pp. 617-641.
Human Dignity, and the Transformation of Moral Rights into Legal Rights.Hans Jörg Sandkühler - 2010 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 2 (4):349-362.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-27

Downloads
84 (#260,425)

6 months
7 (#519,682)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Criminalizing Behaviour to Protect Human Dignity.Tatjana Hörnle - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):307-325.
Two Challenges for Dignity as an Expressive Norm.Jukka Varelius - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):327-340.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Harm to Others.Joel Feinberg - 1984 - Oxford University Press USA.
Punishment and Responsibility.H. L. A. Hart - 1968 - Philosophy 45 (172):162-162.
The Decent Society.Avishai Margalit - 1996 - Ethics 107 (4):729-731.
Privacy, intimacy, and personhood.Jeffrey Reiman - 1976 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1):26-44.

View all 13 references / Add more references