‘Understanding it makes it normal’: is it a reasoning fallacy or not?

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):524-527 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relevance, Validity, and Evidential Reasoning in Clinical Practice.Baigrie Brian & Mercuri Mathew - 2020 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 26:1341-1343.
Examining fallacies in diagnostic reasoning.C. W. Staden - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):528-530.
A short note on probability in clinical medicine.Ross E. G. Upshur - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):463-466.
Analysis: A Physician’s Self-Paced Guide to Critical Thinking. Jenicek, M.Ross Upshur - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (4):538-539.
What is diagnosis? Some critical reflections.Caroline Whitbeck - 1981 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (3):319-329.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
35 (#643,789)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lilia Gurova
New Bulgarian University

Citations of this work

Examining fallacies in diagnostic reasoning.C. W. Staden - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):528-530.

Add more citations