Morality is one of those basic aspects of humanity, like sexuality and eating, that can't fit into one or two academic fields. Moral-ity is unique, however, in having a kind of spell that disguises it and protects its secrets. We all care about morality so passionately that it is hard to look straight at it. We all look at the world through some kind of moral lens, and because most of the academic community uses the same lens, we validate each other's visions and distortions. I think this problem is ... [Book Review]

In Jeffrey Schloss & Michael J. Murray (eds.), The believing primate: scientific, philosophical, and theological reflections on the origin of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 278 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What the Science of Morality Doesn’t Say About Morality.Gabriel Abend - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):157-200.
Moral Relativism.Torbjörn Tännsjö - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (2):123-143.
Constructing Moral Equality.Suzy Killmister - 2023 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9 (4):636-654.
Making Morality Intelligible.Christopher Miles Coope - 2015 - Philosophy 90 (3):403-455.
Incommensurability and moral value.Mark R. Reiff - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (3):237-268.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
28 (#798,682)

6 months
2 (#1,685,557)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?