In Defense of the Compossibility of Presentism and Time Travel

Logos and Episteme 5 (2):141-159 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I defend the compossibility of presentism and time travel from two objections. One objection is that the presentist’s model of time leaves nowhere to travel to; the second objection attempts to equate presentist time travel with suicide. After targeting some misplaced scrutiny of the first objection, I show that presentists have the resources to account for the facts that make for time travel on the traditional Lewisian view. In light of this ability, I argue that both of the objections fail.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Presentist Time Travel.Xuanpu Zhuang - 2022 - Filozofia Nauki 30 (4):101-117.
No Time Travel for Presentists.Steven D. Hales - 2010 - Logos and Episteme 1 (2):353-360.
Reply to Licon on Time Travel.Steven D. Hales - 2011 - Logos and Episteme 2 (4):633-636.
Travelling in A- and B- Time.Theodore Sider - 2005 - The Monist 88 (3):329-335.
Time Travel and the Open Future.Kristie Miller - 2005 - Disputatio 1 (19):223 - 232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-30

Downloads
1,437 (#11,033)

6 months
170 (#20,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Hall
University of Southern California

References found in this work

The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David Lewis - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):145-152.
The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David Lewis - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Presentists should believe in time-travel.S. Keller & M. Nelson - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (3):333 – 345.
Troubles with time travel.William Grey - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (1):55-70.
Time travel: Double your fun.Frank Arntzenius - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (6):599–616.

View all 10 references / Add more references