No Time Travel for Presentists

Logos and Episteme 1 (2):353-360 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the present paper, I offer a new argument to show that presentism about time is incompatible with time travel. Time travel requires leaving the present, which, under presentism, contains all of reality. Therefore to leave the present moment is to leave reality entirely; i.e. to go out of existence. Presentist “time travel” is therefore best seen as a form of suicide, not as a mode of transportation. Eternalists about time do not face the same difficulty, and time travel is compossible with eternalism.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

20690533

DOI

10.5840/logos-episteme2010129

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,964

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

No Suicide for Presentists: A Response to Hales.Jimmy Alfonso Licon - 2011 - Logos and Episteme 2 (3):455-464.
In Defense of the Compossibility of Presentism and Time Travel.Thomas Hall - 2014 - Logos and Episteme 5 (2):141-159.
Back to the Present: Defending Presentist Time Travel.Paul Richard Daniels - 2012 - Disputatio 4 (33):469 - 484.
A Defense of Presentist Time Travel.Xuanpu Zhuang - 2022 - Filozofia Nauki 30 (4):101-117.
Reply to Licon on Time Travel.Steven D. Hales - 2011 - Logos and Episteme 2 (4):633-636.
Presentist time travel and the limits of presentist causality.David Pensgard - 2001 - Philosophy 79 (3):333-345.
Time Travel and the Open Future.Kristie Miller - 2005 - Disputatio 1 (19):223 - 232.
Still No Suicide for Presentists: Why Hales’ Response Fails.Jimmy Alfonso Licon - 2012 - Logos and Episteme (1):149-155.
A Long Time Ago? Time and Time Travel in Star Wars.Philipp Berghofer - 2023 - In Jason T. Eberl & Kevin S. Decker (eds.), Star Wars and Philosophy Strikes Back. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. pp. 99–107.
Presentists can believe in closed timelike curves.Bradley Monton - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):199–202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-05

Downloads
421 (#71,360)

6 months
19 (#140,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Hales
Bloomsburg University

Citations of this work

Time Travel.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2012 - In Ed Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David Lewis - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):145-152.
A Defense of Presentism.Ned Markosian - 2004 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1:47-82.
Presentism and properties.John Bigelow - 1996 - Philosophical Perspectives 10:35-52.
On presentism and triviality.Thomas M. Crisp - 2004 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1:15-20.
Presentism.Thomas M. Crisp - 2003 - In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references