„Prisvärdig“ Forschung? Wilhelm Roux und sein Programm der Entwicklungsmechanik

Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 41 (1):73-97 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Prizeworthy Research?” Wilhelm Roux and His Program of Developmental Mechanics. The Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine is awarded annually to a maximum of three laureates. Not surprisingly, the number of nominees is much larger. Drawing on Nobel Prize nominations in the Nobel archives in Sweden, the core of this paper deals with the nomination letters for the physiologist Wilhelm Roux to discuss competition and some controversies among German physiologists around 1900 in this particular context. The paper elucidates the arguments brought forward to portray Roux as a scientist who had conferred “the greatest benefit to mankind” in the field of physiology or medicine ; examines some other runners-up, and reconstructs why Roux as well as some of his peers were not awarded the Nobel Prize. On a more general level, we argue that an analysis of Nobel Prize nominations contributes to a broader history of excellence in science and medicine in the twentieth century.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Excellence and Chance: The Nobel Prize Case of E. von Behring and É. Roux.Franz Luttenberger - 1996 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18 (2):225 - 239.
„In Stockholm hatte man offenbar irgendwelche Gegenbewegung” – Ferdinand Sauerbruch (1875–1951) und der Nobelpreis.Udo Schagen & Nils Hansson - 2014 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 22 (3):133-161.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-02

Downloads
25 (#877,287)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?