The Hope and Limits of Legal Optimism: A Comment on the Theories of Orts and Nesteruk Regarding the Impact of Law on Corporate Ethics

Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (4):677-688 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Joining the dialogue on the relationship between the law and business ethics, Jeffrey Nesteruk and Eric W. Orts have offeredconceptions of the law as a positive influence rather than a negative curb on corporate behavior. While these “legal optimists” pursue anoble end in promoting higher ethical standards for corporations through the law, they may be overly optimistic in their suggestion that these more skillfully wielded legal models will influence corporate behavior for the better. Reviewing the basic tenets of their two approaches, this paper uses corporate responses to environmental statutes to suggest that while legal optimism may offer hope for promoting corporate ethics, it has definite limitations in its current stage of development

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-24

Downloads
21 (#994,267)

6 months
7 (#652,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Moral implications of law in business: A case of tax loopholes.Joseph Aharony & Aviva Geva - 2003 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 12 (4):378–393.
Moral implications of law in business: a case of tax loopholes.Joseph Aharony & Aviva Geva - 2003 - Business Ethics: A European Review 12 (4):378-393.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethical Standards for Business Lobbying.J. Brooke Hamilton Iii & David Hoch - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (3):117-129.
A Reflexive Model of Environmental Regulation.Eric W. Orts - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (4):779-794.

Add more references