Why the Basic Structure?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (3):303-334 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Rawls famously holds that the basic structure is the 'primary subject of justice.'1 By this, he means that his two principles of justice apply only to a society's major political and social institutions, including chiefly the constitution, the economic and legal systems, and (more contentiously) the family structure.2 This thesis — call it the basic structure restriction — entails that the celebrated difference principle has a narrower scope than one might have expected. It doesn't apply directly to choices that individuals make within the basic structure. Individuals can live up to the demands of justice simply by obeying whatever rules are set by, and by doing what is necessary to sustain, the basic ..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,516

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Coercion, the basic structure, and the family.Blain Neufeld - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):37-54.
Institutions and Social Justice.Ned Diver - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
What makes a basic structure just?Miriam Ronzoni - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (3):203-218.
The division of moral labour and the basic structure restriction.Thomas Porter - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (2):173-199.
The Basic Structure of Society as the Primary Subject of Justice.Samuel Freeman - 2013 - In Jon Mandle & David A. Reidy (eds.), A Companion to Rawls. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 88–111.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-24

Downloads
151 (#150,302)

6 months
16 (#181,451)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Shared intentions, public reason, and political autonomy.Blain Neufeld - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (6):776-804.
Nonideal Justice, Fairness, and Affirmative Action.Matthew Adams - 2021 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 20 (3).
How legitimate expectations matter in climate justice.Lukas H. Meyer & Pranay Sanklecha - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (4):369-393.
A perfectionist basic structure.Avigail Ferdman - 2019 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (7):1-21.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.G. A. Cohen - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):3-30.
Global justice, reciprocity, and the state.Andrea Sangiovanni - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1):3–39.
Extra rempublicam nulla justitia?Joshua Cohen & Charles Sabel - 2006 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2):147–175.
The suasive art of David Hume.M. A. Box - 1990 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references