- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Disenhancement Problem in Agriculture: A Reply to Thompson [Book Review]
NanoEthics 6 (1):47-54 (2012)
Abstract
The Disenhancement Problem in Agriculture: A Reply to Thompson Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 1-8 DOI 10.1007/s11569-012-0138-2 Authors Soraj Hongladarom, Department of Philosophy and Center for Ethics of Science and Technology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand Journal NanoEthics Online ISSN 1871-4765 Print ISSN 1871-4757Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Symposium on Animal Disenhancement: Introduction. [REVIEW]John Weckert - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (1):39-40.
Peter-Paul Verbeek's Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. [REVIEW]Sadjad Soltanzadeh - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (1):77-80.
Imag(in)ing the Nano-scale: Introduction. [REVIEW]Rasmus Tore Slaattelid & Fern Wickson - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (2):159-163.
Converging technologies, shifting boundaries.Tsjalling Swierstra, Marianne Boenink, B. Walhout & R. Van Est - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (3):213-216.
Animal Disenhancement for Animal Welfare: The Apparent Philosophical Conundrums and the Real Exploitation of Animals. A Response to Thompson and Palmer. [REVIEW]Arianna Ferrari - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (1):65-76.
Nanotechnology: Considering the complex ethical, legal, and societal issues with the parameters of human performance. [REVIEW]Linda MacDonald Glenn & Jeanann S. Boyce - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (3):265-275.
Iconoclasts? Who, Us? A Reply to Dolinko.Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):281-287.
A. Whitney Sanford: Growing Stories from India: Religion and the Fate of Agriculture: The University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 2012, 269 pp, ISBN 978-0-8131-3412-3. [REVIEW]Frederick Kirschenmann - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):165-167.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-03-12
Downloads
55 (#393,558)
6 months
11 (#350,815)
2012-03-12
Downloads
55 (#393,558)
6 months
11 (#350,815)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Making Better Sense of Animal Disenhancement: A Reply to Henschke.Marcus Schultz-Bergin - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (1):101-109.
When Enhancements need Therapy: disenhancements, Iatrogenesis, and the responsibility of Military Institutions.Adam Henschke - 2022 - Monash Bioethics Review 41 (1):6-21.
Animals and Technoscientific Developments: Getting Out of Invisibility.Arianna Ferrari - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (1):5-10.
References found in this work
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2