The Argument from Divine Hiddenness

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):433 - 453 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Do we rightly expect a perfectly loving God to bring it about that, right now, we reasonably believe that He exists? It seems so. For love at its best desires the well-being of the beloved, not from a distance, but up close, explicitly participating in her life in a personal fashion, allowing her to draw from that relationship what she may need to flourish. But why suppose that we would be significantly better off were God to engage in an explicit, personal relationship with us? Well, first, there would be broadly moral benefits. We would be able to draw on the resources of that relationship to overcome seemingly everpresent flaws in our character. And we would be more likely to emulate the self-giving love with which we were loved. So loved, we would be more likely to flourish as human beings. Secondly, there would be experiential benefits. We would be, for example, more likely to experience peace and joy stemming from the strong conviction that we were properly related to our Maker, security in suffering knowing that, ultimately, all shall be well, and there would be the sheer pleasure of God's loving presence. As a consequence of these moral and experiential benefits, our relationships with others would likely improve. Thirdly, to be personally related to God is intrinsically valuable, indeed, according to the Christian tradition, the greatest intrinsic good. In these ways our well-being would be enhanced if God were to relate personally to us. Moreover, the best love does not seek a personal relationship only for the sake of the beloved. As Robert Adams rightly notes, "It is an abuse of the word 'love' to say that one loves a person, or any other object, if one does not care, except instrumentally, about one's relation to that object."1 Thus, God would want a personal relationship with us not only for the benefit we would receive from it but for its own sake as well. So, if a perfectly loving God exists, He wants a personal relationship with us, or more accurately, every capable creature, those cognitively and affectively equipped to relate personally with Him..

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Argument from Divine Hiddenness and Christian Love.Jeff Jordan - 2021 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 69 (3):87-103.
Divine Love and the Argument from Divine Hiddenness.Ebrahim Azadegan - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (2):101--116.
Divine hiddenness and the opiate of the people.Travis Dumsday - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (2):193-207.
The Argument from Divine Hiddenness: Response.J. L. Schellenberg - 1996 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26:455-462.
Divine Openness for Physical Relationship.Pavel Butakov - 2021 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 69 (3):141-161.
Will we be free (to sin) in heaven?Michaël Bauwens - 2017 - In Simon Cushing (ed.), Heaven and Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. pp. 231-254.
Some critical reflections on the hiddenness argument.Imran Aijaz & Markus Weidler - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (1):1 - 23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2,510 (#4,472)

6 months
180 (#19,899)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Skeptical theism.Justin P. McBrayer - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (7):611-623.
Two solutions to the problem of divine hiddenness.Andrew Cullison - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):119 - 134.
Divine Openness and Creaturely Non-Resistant Non-Belief.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2015 - In Adam Green & Eleonore Stump (eds.), Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Divine hiddenness as divine mercy.Travis Dumsday - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (2):183 - 198.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Philosophy in Christianity.William Charlton & Godfrey Vesey - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (163):251.

Add more references