Are virtues the proper starting point for morality?

In James Lawrence Dreier (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 99--112 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory.James Lawrence Dreier (ed.) - 2006 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Critical Notice. [REVIEW]John Edelman - 1997 - Philosophical Investigations 20 (4):326-346.
Critical Notice. [REVIEW]John Edelman - 1997 - Philosophical Investigations 20 (4):326-346.
Virtue and Action: Selected Papers, written by Rosalind Hursthouse.Steven Steyl - 2024 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 21 (5-6):739-742.
Virtue and nature.Christopher W. Gowans - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):28-55.
On virtue ethics.Paul Crittenden - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):114 – 116.
Neo-Aristotelianism.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1999 - In Nigel Warburton (ed.), Philosophy: Basic Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 110-122.
How Should One Live?: Essays on the Virtues.Roger Crisp (ed.) - 1998 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
222 (#116,379)

6 months
8 (#600,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rosalind Hursthouse
University of Auckland

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references