Some Remarks on Criminology and Moral Philosophy

Criminal Justice Ethics 38 (3):198-220 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent developments in philosophy and in criminology indicate that there are significant respects in which the two disciplines can be mutually informing. Many philosophers are increasingly interested in exploring empirical aspects of philosophical claims, and criminologists are finding their way past the alleged fact/value distinction and are rediscovering the moral significance of facts, especially regarding punishment and desistance. In some recent criminological studies there are implicit links to the British moralists such as David Hume and Adam Smith, and to Aristotle as well. This paper explicates those links and some of the possibilities for philosophy and criminology to be mutually informing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-23

Downloads
40 (#540,445)

6 months
5 (#1,012,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Jacobs
University of York

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Virtues and Vices.Philippa Foot - 1983 - Noûs 17 (1):117-121.
An enquiry concerning the principles of morals.David Hume - 1957 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 12 (4):411-411.
Choosing Character: Responsibility for Virtue and Vice.Jonathan A. Jacobs - 2001 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Adam Smith.D. D. Raphael - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (4):612-615.

View all 6 references / Add more references