Rand on abortion: A critique

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (2):245 - 261 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

GREGORY R. JOHNSON and DAVID RASMUSSEN argue that Rand's defense of abortion on demand is inconsistent with her own fundamental metaphysical, epistemological, and moral principles, namely that everything that exists has a determinate identity, that the concept of man refers to all of man's characteristics, not just his essential characteristics, and that there is no gap between what an organism truly is and what it ought to be

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Rand the Moderate.Alexander Tabarrok - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):457 - 467.
Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Another Look at Abortion.Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):449 - 456.
Rand on Abortion, Revisited.Gregory R. Johnson & David Rasmussen - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):469-485.
Rand the Moderate.Alexander Tabarrok - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):457-467.
Another Look at Abortion.Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):449-456.
Liberty and nature: The missing link.Gregory R. Johnson - 1999 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (1):135 - 166.
Rand on Obligation and Value.Douglas B. Rasmussen - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):69 - 86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
42 (#531,688)

6 months
1 (#1,886,937)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

When “A Is Not A”: Reflections on a Conversation.Kathleen Touchstone - 2017 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 17 (2):238-274.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references