Can claims for `wrongful life' be justified?

Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (3):162-174 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The authors reject arguments by Professor Joseph Fletcher (author of Situation Ethics) that in some circumstances parents may be held responsible for producing genetically defective offspring, but offer arguments of their own for the same conclusion. Their arguments could, they suggest, justify `wrongful life' claims by the genetically defective infant against the mother. While researching this paper both authors were postdoctoral fellows in medical ethics in the Program on Human Values and Ethics at the University of Tennessee Center for the Health Sciences

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
48 (#458,202)

6 months
9 (#485,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references