Fuller Defenses and Partial Critiques: a Discussion of “Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion”

Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1937-1939 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this commentary, I discuss Christopher Stratman’s article, “Ecotogenesis and the Problem of Abortion.” First, I try to offer some better defenses of assertions that Stratman makes. Next, I question Stratman’s supposition that “there is no morally relevant difference between a fetus and a cryopreserved embryo.” Finally, I challenge the claim that immoral actions cannot give rise to rights.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-14

Downloads
25 (#921,682)

6 months
2 (#1,294,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Kaczor
Loyola Marymount University

Citations of this work

Replies to Kaczor and Rodger.Christopher M. Stratman - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1941-1944.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references