Fuller Defenses and Partial Critiques: a Discussion of “Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion”

Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1937-1939 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this commentary, I discuss Christopher Stratman’s article, “Ecotogenesis and the Problem of Abortion.” First, I try to offer some better defenses of assertions that Stratman makes. Next, I question Stratman’s supposition that “there is no morally relevant difference between a fetus and a cryopreserved embryo.” Finally, I challenge the claim that immoral actions cannot give rise to rights.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,566

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-14

Downloads
26 (#917,074)

6 months
3 (#1,139,482)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Kaczor
Loyola Marymount University

Citations of this work

Replies to Kaczor and Rodger.Christopher M. Stratman - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1941-1944.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references