- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Replies to Kaczor and Rodger
Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1941-1944 (2021)
Abstract
In these replies, I shall respond to criticisms offered by Kaczor and Rodger to my article titled “Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion.” In the process, I shall also try to bring into focus why the possibility of ectogestation will radically alter the shape of the abortion debate.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why Ectogestation Is Unlikely to Transform the Abortion Debate: a Discussion of ‘Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion’.Daniel Rodger - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1929-1935.
Why Ectogestation is Unlikely to Transform the Abortion Debate: A discussion of 'Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion'.Daniel Rodger - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology (4):1-7.
Fuller Defenses and Partial Critiques: a Discussion of “Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion”.Christopher Kaczor - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1937-1939.
Why pro‐life arguments still are not convincing: A reply to my critics.Joona Räsänen - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (9):628-633.
Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion.Christopher M. Stratman - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):683-700.
Book review of "The Ethics of Abortion" by C. Kaczor. [REVIEW]Gerald Keaney - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):319-321.
Ectogestation and the Good Samaritan Argument.Christopher Stratman - 2023 - Journal of Law and the Biosciences 10 (1).
"The Ethics of Abortion" by Christopher Kaczor. [REVIEW]Jason Cruze - 2012 - Philosophia Christi 14 (2):485-490.
Kate Greasley and Christopher Kaczor, Abortion Rights: For and Against.Melissa Moschella - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (5):571-574.
Regulating abortion after ectogestation.Joona Räsänen - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (6):419-422.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-01-12
Downloads
508 (#53,280)
6 months
120 (#42,360)
2021-01-12
Downloads
508 (#53,280)
6 months
120 (#42,360)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion.Christopher M. Stratman - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):683-700.
Why Ectogestation is Unlikely to Transform the Abortion Debate: A discussion of 'Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion'.Daniel Rodger - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology (4):1-7.
On the moral and legal status of abortion.Mary Anne Warren - 2009 - In John P. Lizza (ed.), Defining the beginning and end of life: readings on personal identity and bioethics. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fuller Defenses and Partial Critiques: a Discussion of “Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion”.Christopher Kaczor - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1937-1939.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-qfrlh dc2