EMF controversy in Chigu, Taiwan: contested declarations of risk and scientific knowledge have implications for risk governance

Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 12 (2):81-97 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3354/esep00125

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Challenge of Scientific Uncertainty and Disunity in Risk Assessment and Management of GM Crops.Anne Ingeborg Myhr - 2010 - Environmental Values 19 (1):7-31.
Risk Assessment of Emerging Technologies and Post-Normal Science.Karen Kastenhofer - 2011 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 36 (3):307-333.
Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment.Gaby-Fleur Böl & Leonie Dendler - 2021 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 46 (4):719-754.
Philosophy and Science of Risk: An Introduction.Isabelle Peschard, Yann Benétreau-Dupin & Christopher Wessels - 2022 - London: Routledge.
Complex Governance to Cope with Global Environmental Risk: An Assessment of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. [REVIEW]Bruno Turnheim & Mehmet Y. Tezcan - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):517-533.
Problem Formulation and Option Assessment (PFOA) Linking Governance and Environmental Risk Assessment for Technologies: A Methodology for Problem Analysis of Nanotechnologies and Genetically Engineered Organisms.Kristen C. Nelson, David A. Andow & Michael J. Banker - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):732-748.
Conceptual Questions and Challenges Associated with the Traditional Risk Assessment Paradigm for Nanomaterials.Jutta Jahnel - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (3):261-276.
Risk Calculation as Experience and Action—Assessing and Managing the Risks and Opportunities of Nanomaterials.Christian Büscher - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (3):277-295.
Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management.Deborah G. Mayo & Rachelle D. Hollander (eds.) - 1991 - Oxford University Press USA.
Science and Society in Historical Perspective: Implications for Social Theories of Risk.Maurie J. Cohen - 1999 - Environmental Values 8 (2):153-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-29

Downloads
23 (#939,354)

6 months
6 (#856,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 13 references / Add more references