Comments on Paul Horwich's "On the Alleged Normative Import of Implicit Definitions" (Workshop Implicit Definitions and A Priori Knowledge, GAP 6, Berlin, September 2006) [Book Review]

Abstract

Let R be an epistemic rule of the simplest type: "Accept sentence s!" Assume that R is a basic rule we actually follow: Our accepting the sentence cannot be explained by our following more fundamental rules of sentence-acceptance. Assume furthermore that we feel rationally obliged to follow R; that is, we all agree on the correctness of the epistemic norm N which says: We ought to accept s.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
15 (#1,246,497)

6 months
15 (#217,805)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andreas Kemmerling
University of Heidelberg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references