Ordinals vs. Cardinals in ℕ and Beyond

In Carl Posy & Yemima Ben-Menahem (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge, Objects and Applications: Essays in Memory of Mark Steiner. Springer. pp. 193-225 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ordinality and cardinality, in the finite domain, are ordinarily considered as mere aspects of the very same objects, the natural numbers. Yet Steiner (Mathematics – application and applicability. In: Shapiro S (ed) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press, 2005) draws attention to the intricate interplay between them, which is made implicit by this conception of them. In this chapter, I present a fitting cognitive framework and use it to account for how this situation comes to be. The framework concerns basic principles of object representation in the cognitive system, and particularly when and how different “aspects” of objects come, developmentally, to be integrated into a deeper, combined representation. Our coming to master the natural numbers is then presented as the process of such integration of ordinals and cardinals, based on their well-behaved interaction in the finite domain. This regular connection in the finite domain between ordinality and cardinality, however, is grasped automatically by the cognitive system as a statistical pattern rather than being stated explicitly, mathematically. Philosophically, this case study thus serves as a warning against ignoring cognition’s inner workings. The upshot is a novel, cognitively motivated account of the natural numbers.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Numbers Are Sets.Eric Steinhart - 2002 - Synthese 133 (3):343-361.
Philosophy of Mathematics.Stewart Shapiro - 2003 - In Peter Clark & Katherine Hawley (eds.), Philosophy of science today. New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology.Stewart Shapiro - 1997 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press USA.
Kant on the Mathematical Deficiency of Psychology.Michael Bennett McNulty - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (2):485-509.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-13

Downloads
22 (#966,846)

6 months
6 (#846,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aviv Keren
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references