A Nonlinear View of Scientific Progression: A Reevaluation of Kaposy's Supposed Obligation

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):47-49 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507740.2010.514885

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Clarifying Conceptions of Freedom: Kaposy's Argument Against “The Inference”.William Smith - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):34-36.
The Supposed Obligation to Change One's Beliefs About Ethics Because of Discoveries in Neuroscience.Chris Kaposy - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):23-30.
Alternate Accounts of Rationality Invalidate Kaposy's Argument.Barton Moffatt - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):43-44.
Why We Should Strive Toward Reflexive Scientific Practices in Neuroscience.Kalina Kamenova - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):59-60.
What Role is “Pure Experience” Consciousness Supposed to Play in Medical Ethics?: Pure Experience, Moral Status, and Clinical Decisions.Michael S. Dauber - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (2):117-119.
An Ethical Reevaluation: Where Are the Voices of Those With Anorexia Nervosa and Their Families?Anthony Barnett, Wayne Hall & Adrian Carter - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):73-74.
In Need of Meta-Scientific Experts?Michele Farisco - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (2):50-52.
Enhancement: A Pragmatic View.Timothy Dolan - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):50-52.
Scientific Practice and the Moral Task of Neurophilosophy.Christian Carrozzo - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (3):115-117.
Neuroscience or Neuroscientism? ’A Response to Paul Moes and D. Gareth Jones‘.Mihretu P. Guta - 2011 - Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation 63 (1):69-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
20 (#1,036,437)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Does the distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water?Stephen Toulmin - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 39--47.

Add more references