Clarifying Conceptions of Freedom: Kaposy's Argument Against “The Inference”

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):34-36 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Chris Kaposy's article “The Supposed Obligation to Change One's Beliefs About Ethics Because of Discoveries in Neuroscience” (2010) targets a common “inference” among neuroscientists and ethicists....

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,665

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Alternate Accounts of Rationality Invalidate Kaposy's Argument.Barton Moffatt - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):43-44.
On Behalf of the Eliminativist.J. Robert Thompson - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):39-40.
Ideal Ethical Standards for Contraceptive Use.Francoise Baylis & Chris Kaposy - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (2):19-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
25 (#865,724)

6 months
5 (#1,011,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1982 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free will. New York: Oxford University Press.
How truth governs belief.Nishi Shah - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (4):447-482.
Freedom within Reason.Gary Watson - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (4):890.

View all 6 references / Add more references