Darwin's and Wallace's revolutionary research programme

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (4):367-392 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Research programmes are sets of problems preferred on epistemic grounds and including preferred heuristics for inquiry. Charles Lyell's research programme for biogeograpy includes the problem of explaining the distribution of species constrained by laws governing locomotion and containment of species. Included in the programme are laws governing the supernatural introduction of replacement species. Wallace and Darwin derected arguments against the putative intelligibility of this aspect of Lyell's programme before discovering natural selection, and their defence, at this time of natural laws governing the introduction of new species is interesting as a defence of a noval programme of research, not a defence of a proposed theroy. These arguments are presented and an epistemological foundation is offered for them. 1 The author is indebted to a referee for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolution.Roberta L. Millstein - 2002 - In Peter K. Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of science. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 227–251.
Darwin's evolutionary philosophy: The laws of change.Edward S. Reed - 1978 - Acta Biotheoretica 27 (3-4):201-235.
Invasion on So Grand a Scale: Darwin, Lyell, and Invasive Species.Eric Burns Anderson - 2024 - Journal of the History of Biology 57 (2):207-229.
Introduction: A new programme of research?Harry Collins - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
Physicalism as a Research Programme.Duško Prelević - 2018 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (1):15-33.
Huxley's defence of Darwin.Michael Bartholomew - 1975 - Annals of Science 32 (6):525-535.
Eliminative Pluralism and Integrative Alternatives: The Case of Species.Matthew J. Barker - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (3):657-681.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
95 (#220,806)

6 months
17 (#169,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Occam’s Razor in science: a case study from biogeography.A. Baker - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (2):193-215.
Reasoning to hypotheses: Where do questions come?Matti Sintonen - 2004 - Foundations of Science 9 (3):249-266.
Wallace, Darwin, and the Practice of Natural History.Melinda B. Fagan - 2007 - Journal of the History of Biology 40 (4):601 - 635.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection.Charles Darwin - 1897 - New York: Heritage Press. Edited by George W. Davidson.

View all 16 references / Add more references