Reasons In Support of Evaluations of Works of Art

The Monist 50 (2):222-236 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Critics often give reasons in support of their evaluations of works of art. They say, for example, that a work is bad because it is repetitive, or the characters are not well-delineated, or the colors are too uniformly bright. Or they say that a work is good because of the delicate balance of colors, its wit and excitement, or the way in which each variation of the theme is fresh and yet related to the previous variation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nesting.Eddy M. Zemach - 1990 - The Monist 73 (2):296-311.
An Inductive Model For Criticism.Gary Stahl - 1966 - The Monist 50 (2):237-249.
Are Bad Works of Art 'Works of Art'?Cyril Barrett - 1972 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 6:182-193.
Art and Its Diachronie Dimensions.Julius M. Moravcsik - 1988 - The Monist 71 (2):157-170.
A New Music Criticism?Peter Kivy - 1990 - The Monist 73 (2):247-268.
The Good, The Bad and The Funny.Bashshar Haydar - 2005 - The Monist 88 (1):121-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
62 (#344,015)

6 months
12 (#301,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references