What We Are Responsible for

In Equality and Responsibility. Oxford University Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ch. 3 moves on from the question of why responsibility matters to that of what we are responsible for. It asks what a political, rather than a metaphysical, account of responsibility demands in terms of its preconditions and assesses attributions of responsibility on the basis of claims about volition and affirmation. From there, it moves on to examine claims about responsibility, as these are made in the context of principles of equal opportunity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Facts and Practices of Moral Responsibility.Benjamin De Mesel & Sybren Heyndels - 2019 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (3):790-811.
Responsibility and distributive justice.Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Responsibility and Reciprocity.R. A. Duff - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (4):775-787.
Responsibility.Lucia Raatma - 2014 - Ann Arbor, Michigan: Cherry Lake Publishing.
You Had to Be a Weapon, Ender … We Aimed You.Danielle Wylie - 2013 - In Kevin S. Decker, Ender's Game and Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 163–174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
5 (#1,774,538)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Luck Egalitarianism.Carl Knight - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):924-934.
Why Egalitarians Should Not Care About Equality.Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):507 - 519.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references