Brain Death and Brainstem Death: Philosophical and Ethical Considerations

Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 22:231-249 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the development of the concept of brain death and of the criteria necessary for its recognition. Competing formulations of brain death are assessed and the case for a ‘brainstem’ concept of death is argued. Attention is finally drawn to some of the ethical issues raised by the use of neurological criteria in the diagnosis of human death.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
86 (#244,377)

6 months
11 (#350,815)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Death and reductionism: a reply to John F Catherwood.D. Lamb - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):40-42.
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are 'dead'?J. F. Catherwood - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):34-39.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references