Death and reductionism: a reply to John F Catherwood

Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):40-42 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This reply to John F Catherwood's criticism of brain-related criteria for death argues that brainstem criteria are neither reductionist nor do they presuppose a materialist theory of mind. Furthermore, it is argued that brain-related criteria are compatible with the majority of religious views concerning death

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1136/jme.18.1.40

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Brain Death and Brainstem Death: Philosophical and Ethical Considerations.David Lamb - 1987 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 22:231-249.
Brain Death and Brainstem Death: Philosophical and Ethical Considerations.David Lamb - 1987 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 22:231-249.
Frequent Preservation of Neurologic Function in Brain Death and Brainstem Death Entails False-Positive Misdiagnosis and Cerebral Perfusion.Michael Nair-Collins & Ari R. Joffe - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):255-268.
Cases Abusing Brain Death Definition in Organ Procurement in China.Norbert W. Paul, Kirk C. Allison & Huige Li - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (3):379-385.
Death in Denmark.M. Evans - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):191-194.
Death, Brain Death, and Ethics.David Lamb - 1985 - State University of New York Press.
Catholic Unity on Brain Death and Organ Donation.David Tomasi - 2024 - A Call to Action 1:1-16.
Towards a holistic definition of death: the biological, philosophical and social deficiencies of brain stem death criteria.Abigail Maguire - 2019 - The New Bioethics 25 (2):172-184.
Danish ethics council rejects brain death as the criterion of death -- commentary 1: wanting it both ways.David Lamb - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1):8-9.
Danish ethics council rejects brain death as the criterion of death -- commentary 1: wanting it both ways.David Lamb - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1):8-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
42 (#536,733)

6 months
10 (#423,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Brain Death and Brainstem Death: Philosophical and Ethical Considerations.David Lamb - 1987 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 22:231-249.

Add more references