Context, relevant parts and (lack of) disagreement over taste [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 156 (3):433-439 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Responds to an argument against relativist semantics advanced in Cappelen and Hawthorne’s Relativism and Monadic Truth.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relativistic content and disagreement. [REVIEW]Mark Richard - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (3):421-431.
Relativism and Monadic Truth.Herman Cappelen & John Hawthorne - 2009 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by John Hawthorne.
Context, content, and relativism.Michael Glanzberg - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (1):1--29.
Relativism, Assertion, and Belief.Patrick Greenough - 2011 - In Jessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 1--31.
On the contrary: disagreement, context, and relative truth.Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes - 2011 - Dissertation, University of St Andrews and University of Oslo

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-18

Downloads
202 (#124,252)

6 months
11 (#356,365)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Nathan Lasersohn
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

References found in this work

Truth Without Objectivity.Max Kölbel - 2002 - London and New York: Routledge.
Relativism and disagreement.John MacFarlane - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (1):17-31.
Adjectives in context.Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge.
Indexical Predicates.Daniel Rothschild & Gabriel Segal - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (4):467-493.

View all 9 references / Add more references