Quantification and perspective in relativist semantics

Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):305-337 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Attempts to clarify some issues about the use of hidden arguments to predicates of personal taste, and motivate an analysis which does not make use of such arguments.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
152 (#149,017)

6 months
12 (#275,726)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Nathan Lasersohn
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Citations of this work

Vagueness in Context.Stewart Shapiro - 2006 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
Relativism, metasemantics, and the future.Derek Ball - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (9-10):1036-1086.
Evaluational adjectives.Alex Silk - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1):1-35.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Relativism and Monadic Truth.Herman Cappelen & John Hawthorne - 2009 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by John Hawthorne.
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 2013 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press. pp. 179.

View all 40 references / Add more references