A note on Chichilnisky's social choice paradox

Theory and Decision 52 (3):261-266 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the main results in topological social choice states the non-existence of a continuous, anonymous, and unanimous aggregation rule on spheres. This note provides a proof based upon simple methods such as integration

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/a:1019656013992

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to Bonanno and Nehring.Robert Stalnaker - 1998 - Theory and Decision 45 (3):297-299.
Revealed Preferences in Intertemporal Decision Making.Ludwig Von Auer - 2004 - Theory and Decision 56 (3):269-290.
Correction of 'On the Inconsistency of Equilibrium Refinement'.Werner Güth - 2003 - Theory and Decision 55 (1):85-86.
A Flawed Infinite Decision Puzzle.Myron L. Pulier - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (3):289-290.
Dynamic Coalition Formation in the Apex Game.Emiko Fukuda & Shigeo Muto - 2004 - Theory and Decision 56 (1-2):153-163.
Foreword.J. -L. Vidick - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (4):375-377.
The Sure Thing Principle and the Value of Information: Corrigenda.Edward E. Schlee - 1998 - Theory and Decision 45 (2):199-200.
Announcement.S. R. Miller - 1985 - Philosophical Papers 14 (2):103-103.
Believe in Pascal's Wager? Have I Got a Deal for You!Alexander Tabarrok - 2000 - Theory and Decision 48 (2):123-128.
How many people can be controlled in a group pursuit game.Yaroslavna Pankratova & Svetlana Tarashnina - 2004 - Theory and Decision 56 (1-2):165-181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
52 (#421,487)

6 months
6 (#882,325)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references