Ecouter parler le langage: Triplicité du témoignage

Studia Phaenomenologica 21:41-62 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We explore the idea that a testimony is always constituted by at least three parts—the word of the witness, the listening of the one to whom it is addressed, and language as a symbolic register where speaking and listening are inscribed. Thus, the structure of testimony would not be captured only by the subjective formula “I was there”—a subject designates himself in reference to a past experience—, nor by the intersubjective formula “I am speaking to you”—a subject designates himself and his listener in the synchrony of the word addressing the other. What is also necessary to consider, in order to capture the structure of testimony, is that “there is language”—the testimony transcends diachronically the speaker and the hearer by inscribing them inseparably in the symbolic register that they share, namely language.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-06

Downloads
27 (#824,377)

6 months
7 (#704,497)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dorothée Legrand
École Normale Supérieure

Citations of this work

Husserl's Notion of “Secondary Experience” as an Alternative Basis for Social Epistemology.Michele Averchi - 2023 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 54 (2):187-202.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references