Corporeity, corpus-substantia, and corpus-quantum in Grosseteste’s Commentaries on the Physics and Posterior Analytics

Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 30 (1) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In medieval writers we find a distinction between body as a substance – corpus-substantia – and body as a quantity – corpus-quantitas (or quantum). One of the earliest uses of this distinction is in works written by Robert Grosseteste in the 1220s. In this paper I explore his use and understanding of this distinction. I argue that he understands corpus-substantia as such as a dimensionless composite of a first corporeal form, corporeity, and prime matter. Corporeity itself is an active power for three dimensions. Through its infinite and necessary self-multiplication corporeity extends the prime matter it informs into three dimensions, thereby resulting in corpus-quantum. I explore how Grosseteste’s conception of corporeity, though probably based on ideas found in Avicenna, diverges from different understandings of Avicenna’s conception of corporeity proposed by medieval and modern commentators.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-24

Downloads
19 (#1,063,142)

6 months
7 (#671,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Robert grosseteste.Neil Lewis - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Untangling Robert Grosseteste’s hylomorphism: matter, form, and bodiness.Nicola Polloni - forthcoming - British Journal for the History of Philosophy:1-20.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references