Reply to Philip Kitcher

Philosophy of Science 69 (4):573-577 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Helen Longino.Philip Kitcher - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):569-572.
The Philosophy of Philip Kitcher.Mark Couch & Jessica Pfeifer (eds.) - 2016 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
176 (#135,244)

6 months
17 (#169,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helen Longino
Stanford University

Citations of this work

Pure Epistemic Proceduralism.Fabienne Peter - 2008 - Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 5 (1):33-55.
The Social Epistemology of Consensus and Dissent.Boaz Miller - 2019 - In Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson & Nikolaj Jang Pedersen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 228-237.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references