Russell and Wittgenstein on Incongruent Counterparts and Incompatible Colours

Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 35 (1):43-58 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract:Russell (in Principles of Mathematics) and Wittgenstein (in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus) largely agree on the twin questions of why pairs of congruent objects cannot always be made to coincide and why surfaces can never be uniformly two colours at once. Both philosophers take space and colour to be mathematically representable, construe the relevant impossibilities as mathematical and hold that mathematical impossibility is at root logical. It is not by chance that Russell says nothing about the phenomena in his Introduction to the Tractatus or surprising that Wittgenstein was unmoved by the objection that his account of colour incompatibility puts paid to his early philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Mathematics.Steven F. Savitt - 1979 - Philosophy Research Archives 5:539-553.
"Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus": A "Poem" by Ludwig Wittgenstein.David Rozema - 2002 - Journal of the History of Ideas 63 (2):345.
Wittgenstein on colour exclusion : not fatally mistaken.Andrew Lugg - 1986 - In Abraham Zvie Bar-On (ed.), Grazer Philosophische Studien. Distributed in the U.S.A. By Humanities Press. pp. 1-21.
Wittgenstein and Russell.Graham Stevens - 2017 - In Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 92–109.
The Visual Field in Russell and Wittgenstein.Michael O'Sullivan - 2015 - Philosophical Investigations 38 (4):316-332.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-14

Downloads
140 (#160,053)

6 months
120 (#46,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references