- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Theory and Method in the Neurosciences
Philosophy of Science 68 (4):584-588 (2001)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Theory and Method in the Neurosciences.Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.) - 2001 - Pittsburgh University Press.
Peter K. Machamer, Rick Grush and Peter McLaughlin, eds., Theory and Method in the Neurosciences Reviewed by.Pierre Poirier & Luc Faucher - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (6):422-424.
Under the Lamppost.Marcel Weber - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush, Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 231.
Mechanisms, coherence, and theory choice in the cognitive neurosciences.Peter Machamer - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush, Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 70-80.
A Neurological Perspective.Paul-Walter Schoenle - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush, Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 250.
On the nature of explanation in the neurosciences.Antti Revonsuo - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush, Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 45--69.
Extrapolation from Animal Models.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush, Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 200.
Theory structure in neuroscience.Valerie Gray Hardcastle & C. Matthew Stewart - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush, Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press.
Functional imaging evidence: Some epistemic hotspots.James Bogen - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush, Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 173--199.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-19
Downloads
25 (#921,682)
6 months
6 (#572,300)
2014-03-19
Downloads
25 (#921,682)
6 months
6 (#572,300)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Functionalism, computationalism, and mental contents.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):375-410.
The Brain as an Input–Output Model of the World.Oron Shagrir - 2018 - Minds and Machines 28 (1):53-75.
Some epistemological concerns about dissociative identity disorder and diagnostic practices in psychology.Michael J. Shaffer & Jeffery S. Oakley - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (1):1-29.
Philosophie der Neurowissenschaften.Holger Lyre - 2017 - In Simon Lohse & Thomas Reydon, Grundriss Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Die Philosophien der Einzelwissenschaften. Hamburg: Meiner.
References found in this work
Thinking about mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-wzn75 dc2