The Claims of After Virtue

Analyse & Kritik 6 (1):3-7 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After Virtue claims that it is characteristic of contemporary society that its debates are peculiarly unsettlable; that this state of affairs is the result of the failure by the thinkers of the Enlightenment to construct a rational, secular defence of shared moral principles; and that the Aristotelian tradition of the virtues provides the only rationally defensible alternative to post-Enlightenment morality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

MacIntyre’s Nietzsche or Nietzschean MacIntyre?Buket Korkut - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (2):199-214.
Modern Views on Virtue Ethics.Carmen Dobre - 2021 - Sofia Philosophical Review 14 (1):72-86.
Virtue in Rousseau's Ethics.James Joseph Delaney - 2004 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
V. virtue lost or understanding Macintyre.Marx W. Wartofsky - 1984 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):235 – 250.
After Virtue. [REVIEW]Christos Evangeliou - 1983 - Review of Metaphysics 37 (1):132-134.
Why Kant’s Project Did Not Have to Fail.Lawrence Masek - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76 (Suppl.):253-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-27

Downloads
68 (#309,051)

6 months
16 (#185,084)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alasdair MacIntyre
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references