Tenure is a necessary – not a sufficient – condition for controversial research

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):581-581 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Ceci et al. article is consistent with tenure being a necessary condition for controversial research. In the absence of tenure, as in the United Kingdom, professors have been fired and suspended for politically controversial issues. There are a variety of reasons why tenure does not ensure that professors will engage in controversial research, including career interests and the desire to be liked. (Published Online February 8 2007).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tenure is fine, but rank is sublime.Douglas Peters - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):583-583.
In defense of the tenure system.Greenberg Gary & K. Billings Dorothy - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):578-579.
The untouchables: Benefits, costs, and risks of tenure in real cases.Frank Farley - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):574-575.
Tenure and the political autonomy of faculty inquiry.Jaap Jacobson Anne - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):579-580.
The heuristic value of controversy in science.O. Lilienfeld Scott - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):581.
Testing tenure: Let the market decide.Shermer Michael - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):584-585.
Scientific psychology and tenure.James M. Clark - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):571-572.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#430,260)

6 months
15 (#211,303)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references