Testing tenure: Let the market decide

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):584-585 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tenure debates and disputes are often irresolvable because of the complex and multivariate nature of contractual relationships between faculty and administration, and the nuanced and varying beliefs about tenure held by the professoriate. The Ceci et al. study leads this commentator to suggest a simple solution – allow individual institutions to define the parameters of tenure according to their unique core values. (Published Online February 8 2007).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The untouchables: Benefits, costs, and risks of tenure in real cases.Frank Farley - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):574-575.
Scientific psychology and tenure.James M. Clark - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):571-572.
The simple arithmetic of tenure.C. Donderi Don - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):573-574.
In defense of the tenure system.Greenberg Gary & K. Billings Dorothy - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):578-579.
Tenure and the political autonomy of faculty inquiry.Jaap Jacobson Anne - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):579-580.
The heuristic value of controversy in science.O. Lilienfeld Scott - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):581.
Why ask if tenure is necessary?Jane L. Buck - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):570-570.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#458,768)

6 months
14 (#230,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations