The survival of basic biological research in National Socialist Germany

Journal of the History of Biology 26 (3):519-543 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Virtually no one outside Germany, however, thought that Schramm's story was right. This was because of the war. It was inconceivable to most people that the German beasts would have permitted the extensive experiments underlying his claims to be routinely carried out during the last years of a war they were so badly losing. It was all too easy to image that the work had direct Nazi support and that his experiments were incorrectly analyzed. Wasting time to disprove Schramm was not to most biochemists' liking

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

German existentialism.Martin Heidegger - 1965 - New York,: Wisdom Library; [distributed to the trade by Book Sales. Edited by Dagobert D. Runes.
Using Nazi Scientific Data.Robert M. Martin - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (3):403-.
Emigration, isolation and the slow start of molecular biology in Germany.Ute Deichmann - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (3):449-471.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
22 (#979,103)

6 months
6 (#879,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Die Epilobium-Kontroverse zwischen den Botanikern Heinz Brücher und Ernst Lehmann.Uwe Hoßfeld - 1999 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 7 (1):140-160.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references