CE is not a conservative extension of E

Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):263-275 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The logic CE (for "Classical E") results from adding Boolean negation to Anderson and Belnap's logic E. This paper shows that CE is not a conservative extension of E

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gentzen-Type Methods for Bilattice Negation.Norihiro Kamide - 2005 - Studia Logica 80 (2-3):265-289.
Basic Quasi-Boolean Expansions of Relevance Logics.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (4):727-754.
Modal logic S4 as a paraconsistent logic with a topological semantics.Marcelo E. Coniglio & Leonardo Prieto-Sanabria - 2017 - In Caleiro Carlos, Dionisio Francisco, Gouveia Paula, Mateus Paulo & Rasga João (eds.), Logic and Computation: Essays in Honour of Amilcar Sernadas. College Publications. pp. 171-196.
A Pretabular Classical Relevance Logic.Lisa Galminas & John G. Mersch - 2012 - Studia Logica 100 (6):1211-1221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#500,447)

6 months
4 (#1,238,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edwin Mares
Victoria University of Wellington

References found in this work

Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Neccessity, Vol. I.Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap - 1975 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by Nuel D. Belnap & J. Michael Dunn.
The semantics of entailment — III.Richard Routley & Robert K. Meyer - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (2):192 - 208.
Classical relevant logics II.Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley - 1974 - Studia Logica 33 (2):183 - 194.

View all 6 references / Add more references