Do great apes switch perspectives? Husserl, Tomasello, and operative intentionality

Phenomenology and Mind 26 (26):204 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Becoming Human (2021), evolutionary psychologist Michael Tomasello provides a comprehensive account of the social intentionality which makes us human. One of the many themes discussed is the intentionality required for switching between perspectives. A number of interesting claims are made in these parts, including that great apes (and young infants) have no sense of perspective, no understanding of false beliefs, and do not know they could be wrong about how they experience things. While I am sympathetic to the general purport of Tomasello’s theory of switching perspectives, I believe his theory mispresents the intentional skills that are involved in various pre-conceptual forms of switching perspectives, to the extent that it is worth a brief commentary. I first outline Tomasello’s theory of perspectivalness, and subsequently develop an alternative, based on the phenomenological distinction between operative and thematic intentionality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-31

Downloads
7 (#1,633,946)

6 months
7 (#693,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Corijn van Mazijk
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

Husserl’s Layered Theory of Empathy and Theory of Mind.Corijn van Mazijk - forthcoming - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology:1-18.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references