The New Background of Science [Book Review]

Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 11 (3):494-498 (1936)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00406457

DOI

10.5840/thought193611333

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The New Background of Science.James A. McWilliams - 1934 - New Scholasticism 8 (3):264-266.
The New Background of Science.James Jeans - 1933 - Philosophy 8 (32):489-489.
The New Background of Science.Sir James Jeans - 1935 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 119 (3):271-273.
The new background of science.James Jeans - 1933 - [Ann Arbor]: University of Michigan Press.
The New Background of Science by James Jeans. [REVIEW]H. Davis - 1934 - Isis 21:326-328.
The New Background of Science. By Sir James Jeans, D.Sc., LL.D., F.R.S. (London: Cambridge University Press. 1933. Pp. viii + 303. Price 7s. 6d.). [REVIEW]G. Burniston Brown - 1933 - Philosophy 8 (32):489-.
Crashaw’s Religious Background.Burton Confrey - 1927 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 2 (3):392-402.
The Tomb of St. Peter.José Ruysschaert - 1959 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 34 (1):5-15.
Cardinal Peter Pázmány.Martin P. Harney - 1936 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 11 (2):225-237.
God and Peter Berger.George Kuykendall - 1976 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 51 (4):428-437.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
71 (#296,774)

6 months
4 (#1,255,690)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references