Becoming a Hybrid Entity: A Policy Option for Public Health

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (S2):68-71 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When Congress passed HIPAA, it did not intend to constrain public health's data sharing in the same way as clinical or payers. In fact, HIPAA recognizes data sharing with public health as a matter of national priority and shields this function from its reach. However, a health department may offer services that bring it within HIPAA's purview, such as running a Children's Health Insurance Program or a laboratory that bills electronically. When this is the case, HIPAA requires all information and departments be subject to HIPAA unless the public health authority chooses to hybridize. Health departments might re-assess their coverage and elect to become a hybrid entity, thereby restricting HIPAA to only where required and removing barriers to information sharing with communities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,516

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Recent Developments in Health Law.Curly Kelly - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (2):309-312.
HIPAA Privacy Rule 2.0.Mark A. Rothstein - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):525-528.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-13

Downloads
13 (#1,313,811)

6 months
7 (#684,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Cantor theorem and friends, in logical form.Silvio Valentini - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (4):502-508.

Add more references